Relevance Of Electronic Discovery Statistics

By Linda Ruiz


While the world starts to embrace the changes brought by the dawn of smart technological novelties, more and more professions have become less laborious especially considering how people these days have become open about it. Today, in particular, jobs of many professionals are rather pleasurable not because of the numerous benefits that employees get, but the time they can save doing their grind less effortlessly. What is more, people at the present time are given plenty of opportunity to do their special pursuits far more easily.

However, in conjunction with these changes are critical concerns for which traditional practices are needed to be altered. Whether or not these are related to business or other lines of work, professionals need to do more than necessary for if not, be bound to suffer from worse consequences in future business dealings. As for the legal practice, many have wondered about the relevance of electronic discovery statistics that has now reached to the far ends of the world.
The e-discovery market is not just any trend in the legal practice. This is the core of protection law encompassing the expertise and acumen of different law professionals including those who concentrate on forensics, information technology and records management. And though it is chiefly practiced in the U. S. And several European countries, many other territories have shown interest in implementing such practice.

Litigation and regulatory proceedings require technology-based document reviews and predictive-coding system. With the complexity of the legal tasks, it is only right for the legal office to look for high-speed processing software that is not only capable of categorizing data but execute proper indexing as well.

Sophisticated technologies like this do not only provide maximum ease in quantifying data obtained from previous and current samples. This can deliver accurate results but users are cautioned about the process if they do not really know how this is properly executed. Only through effective use of the system that this can work out well.

Attorneys are also encouraged to do their fair share in reviewing data manually to ensure consistency and reliability. The review process may take long but it is important to double check results. This software is designed to give the most reliable statistical results but that does not mean lawyers are excused from their primary duty.

Results acquired from manual review are, however, tested for accuracy than sophisticated sampling obtained by using the software. Technology-based review can yield precise result with less effort. Nevertheless, manual reviews can be more effective although these are confounding and strenuous.

Meanwhile, technology-based process is still a subject of discussion especially when reliability is involved notwithstanding its cost-effectiveness. Human review process ought to be done more than twice. Results should be compared several times in ord
Sophisticated technologies like this do not only provide maximum ease in quantifying data obtained from previous and current samples. This can deliver accurate results but users are cautioned about the process if they do not really know how this is properly executed. Only through effective use of the system that this can work out well.

Attorneys are also encouraged to do their fair share in reviewing data manually to ensure consistency and reliability. The review process may take long but it is important to double check results. This software is designed to give the most reliable statistical results but that does not mean lawyers are excused from their primary duty.

Results acquired from manual review are, however, tested for accuracy than sophisticated sampling obtained by using the software. Technology-based review can yield precise result with less effort. Nevertheless, manual reviews can be more effective although these are confounding and strenuous.

Meanwhile, technology-based process is still a subject of discussion especially when reliability is involved notwithstanding its cost-effectiveness. Human review process ought to be done more than twice. Results should be compared several times in order to ensure accuracy before final findings are publicized.

And since familiarity with sampling is necessary to obtain the right result, it might be a good idea for legal practitioners to consult experts at such technology and varied scientific phenomena. Experts can show them the right sampling process and determine sample sizes precisely. Also, they can establish absolute confidence level for statistical inferences as much as point to the standard formula of the process.




About the Author:



Related Posts :

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus